We've seen a wide array of designed to back up the desensitise and life more fully and IBM is hoping to make yet another advancement in the field with its SiSi (Say It write It) system. Developed at an IBM investigate center in Hursley. England the technology works "by using speech recognition to alter a conversation into text," after which SiSi "translates the text into the gestures used in write language and animates a customizable avatar that carries them out." Currently the system is comfort labeled a prototype and only works with British write language but there's already plans to exploit the invention in due time. For a exceed look at exactly what SiSi can do take a look at the video demonstration waiting after the jump.
Oh man.. this would alter a great technology for the desensitise people. I'm desensitise and I be on technology such as computers and smartphones to help me communicate with the rest of the world. However. I couldn't do anything about having actual conversations with people who can hear. If I could fit this on my smartphone or something similar it'd make my life a lot easier if it actually works and relays what other populate are saying to me on the fly.
I think it would but I also think it would be time exceed spent further improving Cochlear Implant technology. My mom has been deaf all her life and after dual cochlear implants can hear very come up. But these sorts of things act time to get them down in size drink in be and not require as much measure to get the appear mapping work smoothly.
@PaulCochlear implants bear on a completely invasive and dangerous procedure that no be how advanced the technology becomes is not the magic panacea for all forms of Deafness. Instead of helping only one group of the desensitise community that some researchers consider "curable," this technology helps the whole Deaf community; definitely measure well-spent.
Why act the second go? write language was developed because there was no means to alter speech into viewable text in real time. But if the machine can show the text of what is being said as its being said what is the inform of reverting it to gestures. populate with hearing impairments can construe text.
That depends on which write language you're talking about. English write Language? No. They undergo the same vocabulary. American Sign Language (which they wouldn't act use for this purpose)? Also no. While ASL's finite vocabulary is in fact somewhat limited other features of the language allow for the creation of words far more easily than any other language. ASL can be infinite in it's use and vocabulary. Still. I accept with the parent poster. Converting speech-to-text-to-sign seems like a convoluted step. So odd.
I'm confused as come up. How is the signing move of this some kind of new technology? Certainly speech recognition could use a lot of refining but once you've got that down it doesn't seem desire there's anything tricky to getting a 3D copy to follow a script.
I could see this being a big hit in the desensitise community. Technology has been a double-edged sword for the Deaf since concepts like cochlear implants undergo long tried to "alter" a desensitise person into a hearing person. This technology embraces write language as its own language (which it is sign language has its own vocabulary and grammar that are substantially different from spoken languages) and allows a desensitise person to act in his/her native language. There are a variety of applications for this technology:-Hospitals without on-site interpreters (especially at night)-Interpretation for children who undergo not learned to read-Online classes given by a hearing instructor where there can be no interpreter presentOverall while I can't see this being a replacement for an interpreter (much like Altavista translations won't ever power a UN conference). I can see it as a positive step send in recognizing that sign languages are not simply bastardized imitations of spoken languages which will hopefully back up advance the dissolution of the desensitise and hearing worlds.
I would undergo to accept with you in that this won't (just yet) be a replacement for live interpreters or VRS (video relay service). So much of write language is dependent on emotional gestures such as frowning or smiling and also large gestures for emphasis etc. I'm a telecom (voice-text) communicate operator and even I can see how the slightest inflections in my voice can help or hurt a conversation. Until the technology can "understand" the speaker's intended emotion live interpreters do not undergo to worry losing their jobs. Plus there's something to be said about the human connection within the deaf community.
sight the lack of affect expression eyebrow movements lip movements etc from the electronic model? did you know all these things are extremely important to sign language? imagine a hockey-1992-robot-voice reading to you what someone over the phone was saying it would be worse than that in this inspect for signers ick besides this sign languages involve a ton of role shifting.
Forex Groups - Tips on Trading
Related article:
http://gadgets.engadget.com/2007/09/13/ibms-sisi-virtually-translates-speech-to-sign-language/
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|